Journalists shall not be holding proof

In the idiots ruled France there is a race of people, the President really doesn't like. They're called journalists. You know the guys who report the news. Sometimes they even gather evidence about their claims to avoid lawsuits as they are supposed to tell the truth. Weird people really.

So this is what happened. A few months ago the French President got angry right before an interview and the video of the event leaked out (it is here http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5yyb9_sarkozy-en-off-sur-france-3_news).

As the country is governed by idiots, they gathered together and decided to do something about it. Come on it's giving a bad image of the power that be and there are professionals who are paid handsomely to do it. To prevent a global crisis in the field of political consulting they came with a brilliant idea. Let's sue the journalist.

Cool idea screamed the idiots in awe. But what for? The scene actually took place. Quite simple: let's sue him for holding the tape. What kind of democracy would accept a journalist to have proof of what he's saying?

Everybody applauded.

Now the journalist has been brought to the police station and should be facing judgement in no time.

GD

PS This text is based on the article here  

http://www.liberation.fr/medias/0101640886-propos-hors-antenne-de-sarkozy-un-journaliste-de-rue89-mis-en-examen

PPS It should also be noted that the same French President threatened to sue a journalist for lack of proof as written here

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/dossier/medias-pouvoirs/20080207.OBS9445/nic olas-sarkozy-porte-plainte-contre-nouvelobs-com.html